Chris DiDomenico
- $106,941
- Capital on Autopilot
- 1
- Portfolio
- 24
- Subscribers
- $29.99
- Quarterly
- $99.99
- Yearly
Chris DiDomenico started his own Registered Investment Advisory firm at 20 after publishing original academic research which sought to challenge the commonly accepted weaknesses of the stock market's most prominent index, the S&P 500. His research proved that if you question what the industry has accepted as normal, you can find small alterations that make long-term impacts and can even challenge the belief that risk and return have a positive correlation.
Returns as of . How returns are calculated
| Portfolio | Capital on Autopilot | Month | 3 months | YTD | 1 year | Since start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 The Mag 11 | $106,941 | +6.4% | +5.8% | n/a | n/a | +14.0% |
Chris DiDomenico is an independent Third-Party Pilot and is not an employee, agent of, or supervised by Autopilot. Third-Party Pilots are not investment advisers or regulated or licensed by the SEC or other regulators, owe you no fiduciary duty, and do not provide personalized recommendations or investment advice or ensure suitability for your circumstances. Autopilot doesn't manage, validate, or guarantee this Pilot's portfolios. Learn more: https://start.joinautopilot.com/legal/thirdpartypilots#third-party-pilots
Autopilot Advisers, LLC is an SEC-registered investment adviser (CRD 331749). Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is published data, not a recommendation, not a ranking, and not an order. View important info at https://joinautopilot.com/disclaimer.
The performance data presented reflects the aggregated results of actual client portfolios managed by the Registered Investment Adviser (RIA), based on the trading activity in the securities contained in the relevant portfolio over the specified period. If fewer than 10 clients are invested in the portfolio, the data represents the aggregate performance of all clients following this strategy. Performance figures are shown net of advisory fees, calculated using the applicable subscription fee and an assumed $50,000 account size. Because subscription fees are flat rather than asset-based, accounts smaller than $50,000 would experience a higher effective fee percentage and lower net performance, while larger accounts would experience a lower effective fee percentage. Actual investor outcomes can vary due to factors like brokerage support for fractional shares, account size, trade timing, fees, and taxes, and past performance should not be interpreted as a guarantee of future results or typical of all portfolios.